GMC impartiality double standardsBMJ 2013; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f27 (Published 08 January 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f27
- Peter Wilmshurst, honorary consultant cardiologist1
- 1University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent ST4 6QG, UK
My complaint about Dr Mullen to the General Medical Council (GMC) originated in the MIST trial.1 2 3 He was one of three “responsible authors” of a paper reporting results.3 Dr Nightingale and I told the other steering committee members that we would not be authors because the paper contained false statements.4 We were vindicated when Circulation published an extensive correction, data supplement, and new version of the paper.4 Misleading information about the results was …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial