Corrections

GMC impartiality double standards

BMJ 2013; 346 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f193 (Published 10 January 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f193

During the editing process we misinterpreted the last line of Peter Wilmshurst’s Letter (BMJ 2013;346:f27, doi:10.1136/bmj.f27) so that it was edited to read: “Mullen and the GMC are right to expect impartiality in those analysing evidence when the livelihood of a doctor is at stake, but not when the lives of patients are at risk.” Peter Wilmshurst wanted to correct his meaning here, which would have been more accurately expressed by the sentence: “Mullen and the GMC are right to expect impartiality in those analysing evidence when the livelihood of a doctor is at stake, but wrong not to expect it when the lives of patients are at risk.”

Notes

Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f193

View Abstract