Abstracts often do not accurately reflect trial results, study showsBMJ 2013; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f179 (Published 10 January 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f179
- Nigel Hawkes
Bias and “spin” are commonplace in the reporting of trials of breast cancer treatments, a Canadian team has found. When trials failed to meet their headline objectives, authors often found positive results among the small print, and the severity of adverse effects was often understated.
Authors and journals needed to do better and readers to be alert to such subtle manipulation, say Ian Tannock and colleagues from Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto.
The team searched for phase III trials of treatments of breast cancer between 1995 and 2011, finding 164 that met their criteria. They focused on the abstract—the only part of study …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Sign up for a free trial