Pulmonary embolism

Performance of algorithms and pre-test probability scores is often overlooked in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

BMJ 2013; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1557 (Published 19 March 2013)
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f1557

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Michael Newnham, respiratory registrar1,
  2. Helen Stone, respiratory registrar1,
  3. Ruth Summerfield, radiology consultant1,
  4. Naveed Mustfa, respiratory consultant1
  1. 1University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG, UK
  1. michaelnewnham{at}hotmail.com

The mantra that pre-test probability (PTP) scoring should be the first stage in diagnosing pulmonary embolism is supported by a wealth of evidence.1 2 3 Unfortunately, the performance of diagnostic algorithms and PTP scores in clinical settings is often overlooked; when applied incorrectly the predictive potential is negated.

Our retrospective study of …

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL