Judge was wrong to insist doctors should give “burdensome” treatment to minimally conscious patient, court rules

BMJ 2013; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1455 (Published 4 March 2013)
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f1455

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Clare Dyer
  1. 1BMJ

The Court of Appeal in London has unanimously overturned a ruling by a Court of Protection judge who had refused to sanction the withholding of certain life prolonging treatments from a patient deemed minimally conscious by clinicians.

Last December at the Court of Protection Mr Justice Peter Jackson refused doctors a declaration that they need not give 68 year old David James cardiopulmonary resuscitation, renal replacement therapy, or invasive support for chronic low blood pressure if his condition deteriorated.1

But Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in Liverpool, which was treating him, successfully appealed against the ruling. In a judgment handed down on 1 March the three appeal court judges revealed that they had allowed the trust’s …

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL