Will expansion of the NHS abroad benefit UK patients? Yes

BMJ 2013; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8493 (Published 2 January 2013)
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:e8493

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Philip Leonard, director
  1. 1Healthcare, Ernst and Young, London SE1 2AF, UK
  1. pleonard{at}uk.ey.com

The new NHS mandate calls for hospitals to set up more profit making branches abroad. Philip Leonard says this will bring new revenue to the cash strapped service, but Allyson Pollock (doi:10.1136/bmj.e8496) says that promoting trade in healthcare over universal access benefits no one

One of the quirkier parts of the opening ceremony of the 2012 London Olympic games featured dancers dressed as doctors, nurses, and patients in NHS hospitals. It was met with baffled responses from some of the press, which saw it as celebrating Britain’s socialist heritage. Others expressed concern that it marked a new era of entrepreneurism: the NHS was now open for business and was preparing to export its national treasures to rich foreigners. Inevitably, concerns have been raised that this will be done at great cost to NHS patients because the best of the service will seek foreign gold and UK patients will be left with second rate healthcare.

These worries are misplaced. For a start, investors abroad are really interested in importing services from only the NHS’s mega-brands. These are specialist centres such as Great Ormond …

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL