Feature
Pharmaceuticals
Monoclonal antibodies: magic bullets with a hefty price tag
Cite this as:
BMJ
2012;345:e8346
Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. Although a selection of rapid responses will be included as edited readers' letters in the weekly print issue of the BMJ, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window.
Displaying 1-1 out of 1 published
The price of monoclonal antibodies bears little relationship to the development and production costs.(1). Denosumab, a highly specific monoclonal antibody, which incidentally is advertised on the back cover of this issue of BMJ, costs the NHS only £310 pounds per dose.
The pricing of a near monopoly product is always related to 'how much the market can bear'. Markets tend be ‘inefficient’ with monopoly products and suppliers.
In 1914, faced with rising drug prices, the BMA Pharmaceutical Committee, recommended that ‘Government should exercise its powers’ to control price inflation. Perhaps that advice still remains relevant today.(2)
1. Shaughnessy AF. Monoclonal antibodies: magic bullets with a hefty price tag. BMJ. 2012 Dec 12;345(dec12 1):e8346–e8346.
2. Price of Drugs. Supplement 542. BMJ. 1914 Sep 12;2(2802):S169–S172.
Competing interests: Honararia from various pharmaceutical companies including Amgen, Sanofi and Roche.
Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham. NG5 1PB
Re: Campaigners criticise report into Camelford water poisoning
Published 18 June 2013
Re: Has pancreatic damage from glucagon suppressing diabetes drugs been underplayed?
Published 18 June 2013
Re: Has pancreatic damage from glucagon suppressing diabetes drugs been underplayed?
Published 18 June 2013
Des Spence needs to consider the reality and not just the ideological construct when it comes to vaccines
Published 18 June 2013