Use of Mendelian randomisation to assess potential benefit of clinical intervention

BMJ 2012; 345 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7325 (Published 6 November 2012)
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e7325

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Stephen Burgess, statistician1,
  2. Adam Butterworth, genetic epidemiologist2,
  3. Anders Malarstig, genetic epidemiologist3,
  4. Simon G Thompson, statistician2
  1. 1Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
  2. 2Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
  3. 3Pfizer Global Research and Development, Cambridge
  1. Correspondence to: S Burgess sb452{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk
  • Accepted 21 September 2012

Mendelian randomisation is a technique for assessing causal associations in observational data. Genetic variants associated with the risk factor of interest are regarded in a similar way to random assignment in a clinical trial. The difference in the risk factor due to the genetic variation, however, is materially distinct from the change due to any proposed therapeutic intervention and so might affect the outcome differently. Consequently, it can be misleading to generalise the magnitude of a Mendelian randomisation estimate to the effect of a potential intervention on the risk factor in practice. Awareness of the limitations of such estimates is important for the use of Mendelian randomisation in target based drug development

What is Mendelian randomisation?

If epidemiologists are compared with fishermen, causality is the big fish. It is elusive to find, difficult to catch, and claims to have measured it are often exaggerated. But, despite the challenge, demonstration of causal relations remains a central aim of epidemiological inquiry. Mendelian randomisation is becoming a commonly used technique to make assessment of causality possible from observational data.1 For example, in coronary disease it has recently strengthened the case for a causal role of lipoprotein(a)2 and weakened the case of C reactive protein.3

To perform Mendelian randomisation, we look for a genetic variant with three key features. Firstly, it is associated with the risk factor of interest. Secondly, it divides the observed population into groups similar to arms in a randomised trial, which do not systematically differ with respect to any confounding variable.4 This ensures that any difference in the outcome is because of the genetic variant. Thirdly, it affects the outcome only through the risk factor of interest and not by other biological pathways. Provided these key features hold, we can infer a causal association of the risk factor on the …

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL