Open letter to Roche about oseltamivir trial data2012; 345 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7305 (Published 29 October 2012) Cite this as: 2012;345:e7305
- Fiona Godlee, editor in chief
I am writing to you in your capacity as a member of the board of Roche. As you may be aware, the BMJ has been working with the Cochrane Collaboration in its efforts to get Roche to release the raw data on the effects of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) so that Cochrane can properly fulfil the UK government’s commission for a systematic review of neuraminidase inhibitors based on clinical study reports.
To remind you of the background to this, in 2009 the BMJ published the updated Cochrane review of neuraminidase inhibitors in healthy adults.1 This took the view that, since eight of the 10 randomised controlled trials on which effectiveness claims were based were never published and because the only two that had been published were funded by Roche and authored by Roche employees and external experts paid by Roche, the evidence could not be relied on. The BMJ also published an article summarising the Cochrane team’s efforts to obtain the data from these randomised controlled trials and a feature investigation exploring the underlying issues.2 3
After these articles were published, we and the Cochrane Collaboration received public assurances from Roche that the data from these 10 trials would be made available to physicians and scientists.4 Although some further data have been released to the Cochrane reviewers, the data that were promised (“full study reports”) have not been made available.
Below is a table showing which “modules” (sections) of the 10 trials Roche has so far refused to make available.⇓ Also attached is a graphic, taken from a single study report, which explains the kind of content contained in each module of a full study report.⇓ This gives an indication of what can be expected in the modules that Roche has as yet not provided.
The Cochrane reviewers now know that there are at least 123 trials of oseltamivir and that most (60%) of the patient data from Roche’s phase III completed treatment trials remain unpublished. We have concerns on a number of fronts: the likely overstating of effectiveness and the apparent under-reporting of potentially serious adverse effects. Meanwhile, oseltamivir has just been added to the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines, alongside aspirin and β blockers.
On behalf of the Cochrane collaborators and public health decision makers around the world, I ask Roche to honour its publicly stated promise to make available the full clinical study reports. In order for the Cochrane collaborators to properly analyse these data they will need individual patient data in electronic format.
Oseltamivir has been a great commercial success for Roche. Billions of pounds of public money have been spent on it, and yet the evidence on its effectiveness and safety remains hidden from appropriate and necessary independent scrutiny. I am appealing to you, as an internationally respected scientist and clinician and a leader of clinical research in the United Kingdom, to bring your influence to bear on your colleagues on Roche’s board. As company directors, responsibility for Roche’s behaviour rests with you, as individuals and collectively. In refusing to release these data of enormous public interest, you put Roche outside the circle of responsible pharmaceutical companies. Releasing the data would do a great deal to restore confidence in the company and its board of directors.
We plan to publish this letter in the BMJ, and we would welcome a reply from you to publish alongside it. We would need to receive your reply by Thursday 18 October or Friday 19 at the latest. I look forward to hearing from you.
With best wishes
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e7305
Competing interests: None declared.
This is an edited version of the letter sent to Roche on 11 October 2012; the original is at bmj.com/tamiflu. John Bell has responded saying that he has referred the letter to Roche.