Hip arthroplasty

Authors’ reply to National Joint Registry

BMJ 2012; 345 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7246 (Published 31 October 2012)
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e7246

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. D J W McMinn, consultant orthopaedic surgeon1,
  2. J Daniel, director of research1,
  3. R B C Treacy, consultant orthopaedic surgeon2,
  4. R D Riley, reader in biostatistics3
  1. 1McMinn Centre, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 3DP, UK
  2. 2Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Northfield, Birmingham
  3. 3School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
  1. r.d.riley{at}bham.ac.uk

The National Joint Registry (NJR) was aware that the data supplied would be used by clinical teams associated with Smith & Nephew (including first author McMinn).1 2 The data were originally requested because the NJR’s editorial chairman invited McMinn “to criticise registry data . . . to support the value of resurfacing” at the British and Irish Orthopaedic Congress 2011. McMinn therefore asked Smith …

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL