Evidence for damage control resuscitation is lackingBMJ 2012; 345 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7205 (Published 30 October 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e7205
- Matthew D Wiles, consultant neuroanaesthetist
- 1Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK
The authors of this clinical review advocate damage control resuscitation (DCR) and permissive hypotension in multiply injured patients,1 but good evidence is lacking.
Much of the evidence for permissive hypotension has been extrapolated from animal studies. Although the largest human study cited by the authors suggested some benefit from a DCR strategy, there were …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial