Ethics committee chairwoman is not obliged to reveal source of concerns about surgeon’s work, judge rules

BMJ 2012; 345 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7130 (Published 22 October 2012)
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e7130

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Clare Dyer
  1. 1BMJ

A surgeon has failed in a High Court attempt to try to find out who made remarks he considered slanderous about him, so that he could sue for defamation.

Hilali Noordeen, an orthopaedic surgeon at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital in Stanmore, northwest London, asked the court to order Rosemary Hill, chairwoman of the London Stanmore research ethics committee, to reveal who made the comments to her and what they said.

The remarks made to Hill led Janet Wisely, director of the National Research Ethics Service, to write a letter to the Royal National’s joint medical directors, which “outraged” Noordeen, the court heard.

The surgeon, an expert in scoliosis who previously worked at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, had applied to the London Stanmore research ethics committee for approval to do a study on magnetic growth rods.

Developed in 2009, …

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL