NICE on spasticity

Authors’ reply to Crilly, and Willoughby and Graham

BMJ 2012; 345 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6679 (Published 9 October 2012)
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e6679

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Moira A Mugglestone, director of guideline development1,
  2. Paul Eunson, consultant paediatric neurologist2,
  3. M Stephen Murphy, clinical co-director (children’s health)1
  4. On behalf of the Guideline Development Group
  1. 1National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health, London W1T 2QA, UK
  2. 2Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh EH9 1LF, UK
  1. mmugglestone{at}ncc-wch.org.uk

Opinions differ on the place of selective dorsal rhizotomy in managing spasticity in children. In a recent debate in the House of Commons it was strongly advocated, as being “more robust than any other treatment for cerebral palsy.”1

We as guideline developers knew about the lack of high quality clinical evidence for the procedure, particularly in relation to important functional benefits and long term outcomes. We considered the three randomised controlled trials in the meta-analysis cited by Crilly. …

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL