Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients’ preferences matter

BMJ 2012; 345 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6572 (Published 8 November 2012)
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e6572

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Albert G Mulley, director1,
  2. Chris Trimble, adjunct professor1,
  3. Glyn Elwyn, visiting professor1
  1. 1Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
  1. Correspondence to: G Elwyn elwyng{at}cardiff.ac.uk
  • Accepted 6 September 2012

Correct treatment recommendations require accurate diagnosis not only of the medical condition but of patients’ treatment preferences. Al Mulley, Chris Trimble, and Glyn Elwyn outline how to ensure that preferences are not misdiagnosed

In recent decades, rapid advances in the biosciences have delivered an explosion of treatment options. This is good news for patients, but it makes medical decision making more complicated. Most critically, an accurate medical diagnosis is no longer sufficient to identify the proper treatment. Just as important is an accurate preference diagnosis.1 Every option for treatment (a term that we use broadly here, to include procedures, tests, and even watchful waiting) has a unique profile of risks, benefits, and side effects. Doctors, generalists as well as specialists, cannot recommend the right treatment without understanding how the patient values the trade-offs. Regrettably, patients’ preferences are often misdiagnosed. We outline a method for making better preference diagnoses.

Historical perspective

“Listen to the patient: he is telling you the diagnosis,” William Osler urged students he taught at Johns Hopkins and Oxford more than a century ago. Osler knew that the patient’s story was often critical to an accurate diagnosis. Like many of his contemporaries, Osler saw diagnosis as the medical profession’s foundational skill. The right treatment, after all, depended on the right diagnosis. Generations later, skill in diagnosis remains a source of professional pride for many physicians, while the spectre of a misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis can provoke sleepless nights.

Medicine has changed since Osler’s day, in that there are now more diagnostic technologies and more treatment options. Although the rising accuracy of diagnostic tests has allowed doctors to rely less on listening when determining the cause of symptoms,2 listening is growing in importance when deciding which of the many treatment options best fits each patient’s priorities.

The …

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL