Recent rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. Although a selection of rapid responses will be included as edited readers' letters in the weekly print issue of the BMJ, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window.
Displaying 1-2 out of 2 published
12 December 2012
Coming from an all-empowering, all-girls school, the notion that: ‘women entering competitive professions such as Medicine would have to make the most of all possible opportunities to avoid disappointment’ was hardwired. Since the Equal Pay Act of 1970, young women have often been advised to ask for a higher salary in their professional working lives in order to offset preordained substandard salaries.
This is not to say that there are not legitimate reasons for disparities between salaries of men and women. It is a fact that if women wish to do all the other things women do (pregnancy, child rearing etc), they must take more time out of their working lives and subsequently lose out on the chance to increase their experience in the field and so progress to higher earning grades. However, in modern society women do not necessarily need to ‘fall behind’ in the career ladder after having a family. The traditional image of the mother staying at home has been replaced with children being raised with the help of child minding services and after school groups; so in modern society it follows that it is not the norm for a woman to miss out on so much simply because she has had a child. Appleby mentions a 28.6% pay gap, however he does not specify female doctors’ familial status and so we can’t make solid conclusions about whether the gap is due to “legitimate” reasons leading to differences in grade or “unexplained factors”.
If we took a broader overview of the situation without examining the details, we would see that the numbers don’t add up. If we consider the fact that by 2017 the medical workforce is predicted to be mostly female and that across the UK the medical school acceptance rate is 56% female, then the 28.6% pay gap between men and women would seem to not only devalue female doctors within the NHS, but target future budget cuts by penalizing its main workforce.
Even when we justify and legitimize the difference in pay due to, say, grade, we have to echo the blindingly obvious question of why this is the case. Is pay disparity between men and women in the NHS simply due to gender inequality – or is there a hidden financial, cost-cutting agenda in place?
1 Khan, Maham. Medicine- a woman’s world? BMJ 2012 Jan 05. http://careers.bmj.com/careers/advice/view-article.html?id=20006082.
Competing interests: None declared
King’s College London. , Hodgkin Building, Guy's Campus, King's College London, SE1 1UL
21 September 2012
In our part of the world not only are women equal to men, often they are better and better paid than men. Women being lesser than men is in fact not understandable.
Competing interests: None declared
JNMC, AMU, Aligarh 202002, India, JNMC, AMU, Aligarh 202002, India








Re: Better management of patients with multimorbidity
Published 17 May 2013
Re: India must raise the status of primary care
Published 17 May 2013
Re: Partnering with patients
Published 17 May 2013
Re: Rescue boards are set up in England to deal with “significant deterioration” in A&E departments
Published 17 May 2013