Letter
A jab in the dark
JCVI processes should be more rigorous than those of scientific journals
Cite this as:
BMJ
2012;345:e5986
- Azeem Majeed, professor of primary care1
- 1Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
- a.majeed{at}imperial.ac.uk
Hall states that the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) does not make public all the evidence it uses for its decisions because this would lead to scientists refusing to send their work to the committee before it was published in a peer reviewed journal.1 2 Can the committee supply evidence that academics …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
Social bookmarking