Letter
A jab in the dark
JCVI processes are at least as robust as those of scientific journals
Cite this as:
BMJ
2012;345:e5984
- Andrew J Hall, epidemiologist1
- 1London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
- andy.hall{at}lshtm.ac.uk
Hawkes proposes that the evidence on which the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) bases its decisions should be placed on a website.1 He also suggests that not to do so can only be due to academic vanity. However, academics are now judged and rewarded on the basis of their …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
Social bookmarking