Increased risk of preterm birth after treatment for CIN

BMJ 2012; 345 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5847 (Published 04 September 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e5847
  1. M Kyrgiou, gynaecological oncology subspecialty trainee1,
  2. M Arbyn, epidemiologist2,
  3. P Martin-Hirsch, consultant gynaecologist3,
  4. E Paraskevaidis, professor in obstetrics and gynaecology4
  1. 1West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea-Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK
  2. 2Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium
  3. 3Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
  4. 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
  1. mkyrgiou{at}yahoo.com

Underlying mechanisms and contributing factors still need unpicking

Meta-analyses published a few years ago in the Lancet and the BMJ showed an increased risk of adverse obstetric outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).1 2 Since then many studies, from large national linkage to small cohort studies, have confirmed the association. The cause remains unclear; however, potential mechanisms include anatomical changes,3 cicatrisation of the cervix,4 immunological factors, and alterations of the cervicovaginal flora. In a linked research study (doi:10.1136/bmj.e5174), Castanon and colleagues suggest that the increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes may not be attributable solely to the treatment itself but to common risk factors that also predispose to precancerous cervical conditions.5 This retrospective linkage study from 12 quality assured British colposcopy centres evaluated outcomes derived from a sample population of 18 441 births. With a comprehensive analysis aimed at optimising control for possible confounders, the authors again found an association between treatment for CIN and preterm birth, but to a smaller degree than previous estimates.

The differences in the size of the treatment effect across studies may be partly explained by the choice of control population, because women with CIN may have …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution