Editorial on identifying melanomas in primary care was muddledBMJ 2012; 345 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5416 (Published 21 August 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e5416
- Joanna Bayley, general practitioner1
- 1Gloucester Health Access Centre, Gloucester GL1 1PX, UK
Newton-Bishop and Lorigan’s thinking on whether we can improve the identification of melanomas in primary care is muddled and their conclusions are lazy.1 They object to current referral rates for suspected melanoma, despite 91% compliance with referral guidelines, but offer no guidance on what referral rates should be. They give no international comparators to indicate whether UK …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial