Feature
Medical Technology
Proton beam therapy: more than a leap of faith?
Cite this as:
BMJ
2012;345:e4917
Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. Although a selection of rapid responses will be included as edited readers' letters in the weekly print issue of the BMJ, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window.
Displaying 1-1 out of 1 published
Editor
Proton beam therapy uses protons to treat tumor cells mostly cancer patients. It has an advantage over other treatment procedures because it is accurate in localizing radiation dosage. The beams of protons do not scatter to the sides of the tissue because it does not broaden as much. The surrounding tissues have reported low level of damages to tissue surrounding it. However, most treatments use protons with different energies that have variant Bragg peaks and at different depths. Spread-Out Bragg Peak is the total dosage of radiation of protons, and it affects the tissues lying shallow or in front of the tumor cells(Khan 2010).
I thank the authors to reflecting on the current difficulties surrounding the proton beam therapy.
It should also be highlighted that there has been an improvement in pencil scan treatment to sensitive organs such as eye and spinal cord with reduced damages. additional research is mandatory to improve the evidence based approach behind proton beam therapy.
References
1-Khan, F. (2010). The physics of radiation therapy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Competing interests: None declared
Hwel Dda Nhs Trust, prince philip hospital
Re: Better management of patients with multimorbidity
Published 17 May 2013
Re: India must raise the status of primary care
Published 17 May 2013
Re: Partnering with patients
Published 17 May 2013
Re: Rescue boards are set up in England to deal with “significant deterioration” in A&E departments
Published 17 May 2013