Research
Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY)
Cite this as:
BMJ
2012;345:e4693
Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. Although a selection of rapid responses will be included as edited readers' letters in the weekly print issue of the BMJ, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window.
Displaying 1-2 out of 2 published
We would like to thank Professor Waldorff and research group for the article about psychosocial interventions in patients with mild Alzheimer´s disease in BMJ, 17th July 2012.
There is a high comorbidity of early dementia and depression (Aminzadeh F, Ageing Mental Health 2007; Ownby RL, Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; Burns A, BMJ 2009) that worsens the outcome (Modrego PJ, Aging Clin Exp Res 2004, Starkstein SE, Int Rev Psychiatry 2008), so the significant positive effect of “DAISY” on depressive symptoms is relevant.
The intervention of Waldorff et al combines caregiver support, psychosocial and biographical aspects, validation and empowerment, i.e. most of the approaches shown to be effective in literature (Woods B, Cochrane Database 2005; Olazaran J, Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2010; Tilvis RS, Lancet 2000, Bennett DA, Lancet Neurol 2006, Werheid K, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009, Kasl-Godley J, Clin Psychol rev 2000) even if previous data is limited and sometimes of poor quality.
With support by the Robert Bosch and the Dietmar Hopp foundations, our working group performed a trial about cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in physically ill patients with comorbid depression with a mean age of 82 (“AIDE- Acute Illness and depression in elderly patients”, Hummel et al. 2012; further publications in preparation). Although we could demonstrate that CBT was highly effective in this patient group, the intervention showed comparatively little effect and considerably less benefit in the subgroup of mildly cognitively impaired patients (Hummel J et al, Z Gerontol Geriatr 2012). Qualitative analyses of our data revealed the importance of stress factors like increasing loneliness and functional loss in old age and comorbidities like depression and dementia that can enhance the progress of disease and limit the efficacy of therapies.
Thus, both the study by Waldorff et al. applying a philosophical approach as part of a combined intervention and our own data with CBT stress the need to develop new types of psychosocial intervention in early dementia.
Competing interests: None declared
Geriatric Center Agaplesion Bethanien, Rohrbacher Str 149, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany
This interesting study fails to show any benefit from psychosocial intervention. In the future there should be modification of the type of intervention. Psychosocial intervention should always be part of the management of dementia because of the chronicity and the disabling and long term consequences of treatment of dementia.
Competing interests: None declared
Neurology Department Bethesda Hospital , Sudirman 70 Yogyakarta 55224 Indonesia
No more diapers for Greek patients!
Published 24 May 2013
Re: Claimed level of overdiagnisis in Denmark does not fit observed data
Published 24 May 2013
Re: Risk of incident diabetes among patients treated with statins: population based study
Published 24 May 2013
Re: CT radiation risks coming into clearer focus
Published 24 May 2013