This article has a correction
Please see: Colombia’s response to healthcare crisis
- Oscar Bernal, assistant professor1,
- Juan Camilo Forero, research assistant1,
- Ian Forde, research fellow2
- 1School of Government, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 No 19-27, Bloque AU, Tercer Piso, Bogotá, Colombia
- 2Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK
- Correspondence to: O Bernal obernal{at}uniandes.edu.co
- Accepted 29 December 2011
Colombia is struggling to provide an affordable and effective health system for its population. As in most of Latin America, its healthcare challenges include rising chronic diseases, persistent infectious diseases, and worsening inequity. More uniquely, around 3.4 million people are registered as internally displaced1 and, although declining, murder and intentional injury remain major problems. Almost half (45.5%) of Colombians live below the poverty line, and the country’s Gini coefficient, a measure of inequality, was 0.587 in 2009,2 the highest in Latin America.
Colombia currently ranks 87 out of 187 on the United Nation’s human development index with a per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of $9800.3 Around 5.8% of GDP is spent on healthcare, infant mortality is 15.5 deaths/1000 live births, and life expectancy at birth is 73.7 years.3 4 These statistics compare favourably with neighbouring countries, as the table⇓ shows. However, rising costs, waiting lists, and poor quality have left the system in disarray.
- In this window
- In a new window
Health and development statistics for Colombia and neighbouring countries
Origins of health sector crisis
Before 1993, healthcare was provided through a single public insurer. Planning was highly centralised and poorly responsive to changing needs; furthermore, 30% of Colombians were uninsured, and out of pocket payments made up 53% of total healthcare spending.6 In 1993, Law 100 introduced private insurers under regulated competition. People in formal employment could opt to purchase health insurance through regular salary contributions, while those who were unemployed, informally employed, or very poor remained publicly subsidised.
The law specified a basic package of services to which members …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Why the US healthcare system is failing, and what might rescue it
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Risk of cardiovascular serious adverse events associated with varenicline use for tobacco cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 16 May 2012
Most responses
Is spending on proton beam therapy for cancer going too far, too fast? (11 responses)
Published 17 Apr 2012 - 23:32
What are the benefits of an early diagnosis? (8 responses)
Published 18 Apr 2012
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21