- Dhruv V Patel, specialist registrar, clinical radiology,
- Victoria Scott, foundation year 2 doctor,
- James Pilcher, consultant radiologist
- 1St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust, London, SW17 0QT
- Correspondence to: D Patel dhruv_patel{at}hotmail.com
Learning points
Incidental liver lesions on medical imaging are relatively common and the vast majority are benign
Fatty infiltration is increasing in prevalence and can make the detection and characterisation of focal liver lesions difficult
The choice of and need for further investigation when a focal liver lesion is identified depends on several patient factors and ideally should be recommended by the reporting radiologist
Contrast enhanced ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions rely on the recognition of characteristic enhancement patterns
Biopsy may be needed where imaging fails to characterise a lesion adequately
A 31 year old Anglo-Indian man presented to his general practitioner for a discussion of cardiovascular risk factors because of a strong family history of ischaemic heart disease. He had no medical history of note. The patient denied excessive consumption of alcohol, although he admitted to a relatively unhealthy, high fat diet. Routine liver function tests showed raised alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase. The patient was subsequently referred for abdominal ultrasonography, which showed moderate fatty change throughout the liver and an incidental 2.4 cm focal mass of mixed reflectivity in segment VII (fig 1⇓).
Fig 1 Conventional ultrasound image showing focal hyporeflective lesion (white arrow) in segment VII of the liver with background increased reflectivity consistent with fatty infiltration
What is the next investigation?
Various imaging methods incidentally show focal liver lesions. The primary function of investigating a focal liver lesion is to characterise it with confidence as either needing no or only routine follow-up, or needing further, more rigorous exploration (including biopsy). The exclusion of malignancy is paramount, and most benign lesions can be characterised on non-invasive imaging grounds alone.
Conventional ultrasonography is often used as the first line imaging investigation …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Why the US healthcare system is failing, and what might rescue it
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Risk of cardiovascular serious adverse events associated with varenicline use for tobacco cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 16 May 2012
Most responses
Is spending on proton beam therapy for cancer going too far, too fast? (11 responses)
Published 17 Apr 2012 - 23:32
What are the benefits of an early diagnosis? (8 responses)
Published 18 Apr 2012
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21