Controversies over hypertension guidelines

BMJ 2012; 344 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e653 (Published 25 January 2012)
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e653

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
  1. fgodlee{at}bmj.com

The proper management of hypertension is arguably one of modern medicine’s most effective preventive interventions. It’s also one for which we have lots of clinical trial data, as well as a good number of well done meta-analyses. Yet as this week’s BMJ shows, controversy about how best to diagnose and treat hypertension in adults is still alive and well.

The 2011 guidance from the UK’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has been met with a blast of criticism. This week we present two different critiques: the first suggesting that the guidelines are overcomplicated, the second that they are insufficiently evidence based. In a third article, …

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL