This article has a correction
Please see: Managing retinal vein occlusion
- Christine A Kiire, clinical research fellow and ophthalmic specialty trainee,
- N Victor Chong, consultant ophthalmic surgeon
- 1Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
- Correspondence to: V Chong victor.chong{at}eye.ox.ac.uk
- Accepted 10 January 2012
Summary points
Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular disease after diabetic retinopathy
Occlusion can occur in the central retinal vein or, more commonly, in a branch retinal vein
The main risk factors for retinal vein occlusion are age over 50 and hypertension
Signs of retinal ischaemia include poor visual acuity, relative afferent pupillary defect, multiple intraretinal haemorrhages, multiple cotton wool spots, and dilated and tortuous retinal veins
Management of underlying medical conditions and cardiovascular risk factors is important
Ophthalmic treatments now include intraocular dexamethasone implants and, potentially, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors
Retinal vein occlusion—obstruction of the retinal venous system by thrombus formation, external compression, or disease of the vein wall1—is the second most common retinal vascular disease after diabetic retinopathy.2 Pooled data from population studies in the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia suggest that about 16 million adults are affected by this condition.3 Not all cases need treatment. In the past, the visual prognosis for most patients was poor because treatment comprised lowering the pressure in the eye, if raised, and laser treatment to try to control associated complications. However, two new treatments have recently been licensed in the US and the European Union, one of which has been approved by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for use in England and Wales. Consequently, the outlook for patients with retinal vein occlusion is likely to improve. We review the diagnosis and management of retinal vein occlusion and examine the evidence for the effectiveness of the newly licensed drugs.
Sources and selection criteria
We searched PubMed for articles on retinal vein occlusion that had been published in 2010 and 2011 and looked for published evidence that had been presented in major ophthalmology meetings up to 1 October 2011, focusing mainly on well designed randomised …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record








CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27