Editorials

Tackling the problems of seriously challenged NHS providers

BMJ 2012; 344 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4422 (Published 27 June 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e4422
  1. Chris Ham, chief executive,
  2. Anna Dixon, director of policy
  1. 1King’s Fund, London W1G 0AN, UK
  1. c.ham{at}kingsfund.org.uk

Requires moving away from the usual solutions and applying the right remedies

The experience of South London Healthcare NHS Trust highlights the inadequacies of existing approaches to dealing with failing healthcare providers.1 The trust, which was created from a merger between hospitals that had well known financial and quality challenges, had a deficit of £65m (€81m; $101m) in 2011-12, and a similar deficit is projected for the current financial year.

One of three remedies has usually been applied to NHS providers who face challenges in delivering care of an acceptable standard within budget. The first approach is often to appoint a new chief executive and senior team. The problem with this approach is that the causes of failure may not be a result of poor management or weak governance. The scale of the difficulties facing the most challenged providers today is without precedent, and even the most able leaders will struggle to overcome them. Only when the underlying causes are properly understood can appropriate interventions be developed.

The second approach is to merge challenged providers with organisations that are performing well. Although this may help in some situations, well performing organisations may find their own performance dragged down by the work involved in supporting providers with which they merge. The evidence on mergers suggests that caution is needed, …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial

Subscribe