Planned place of birth analysis

Flawed analysis may be used to restrict birth choices

BMJ 2012; 344 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e3842 (Published 1 June 2012)
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e3842

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Pauline M Hull, author and editor1
  1. 1electivecesarean.com, Farnham, UK
  1. info{at}electivecesarean.com

This analysis of the Birthplace study has some of the same inherent flaws in its collection and analysis of comparative data, but worse, its promise of “cost effectiveness” in today’s economic climate and imminent restructuring of the NHS may be improperly used for political and ideological restriction of “low risk” women’s choices.1

The cost analysis is incomplete. Adverse downstream costs such as litigation, infant and maternal injuries, and trauma …

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL