Traditional birth attendants are an effective resourceBMJ 2012; 344 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e365 (Published 18 January 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e365
- Ellen Hodnett, professor
- 1Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5T 1P8
Traditional birth attendants, regardless of how well trained or resourced, are commonly thought to be a poor substitute for care by skilled birth attendants (defined as care providers with professional qualifications, such as doctors, midwives, or nurses) in a healthcare facility. In the linked meta-analysis of studies of deliveries assisted by traditional birth attendants, Wilson and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj.d7102) found that offering training, support, and resources—such as clean delivery kits—to traditional birth attendants reduced perinatal and neonatal deaths in low income countries.1 This study provides compelling evidence that trained and supported traditional birth attendants save babies’ lives.
There are enormous economic and logistical barriers to the provision of skilled birth attendants in many countries, especially where women live in remote areas with inadequate transport to healthcare facilities. “Healthcare facility” is a term that encompasses everything from a stand alone birth centre …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial