How we got it wrong with breast screeningBMJ 2012; 344 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e3450 (Published 17 May 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e3450
- Klim McPherson, visiting professor of public health epidemiology, University of Oxford
Peter Gøtzsche, having studied the science of mammography screening for a long time, is an angry man. And he has every reason to be. Like most public policy, that for mammography screening has apparently ignored much of the science. Unlike most public policy, however, breast screening is essentially a scientific medical service. In his book Mammography Screening: Truth, Lies and Controversies, Gøtzsche tells a fascinating story about how and why a costly, even iconic, public service for women has collectively behaved like a hunted tiger. There has not been enough calm and measured discussion of the evidence. This is a seminal account of the role of science in delivering a popular public screening service, which has enormous face validity and professional commitment. At issue is the emerging evidence from continuous follow-up of a service that began in the …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial