Yankee Doodling

How will the US Supreme Court rule on health reform?

BMJ 2012; 344 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2626 (Published 11 April 2012)
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e2626

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Douglas Kamerow, chief scientist at RTI International and associate editor at BMJ
  1. dkamerow{at}rti.org

Fearless (foolhardy?) predictions based on the oral arguments

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, now two years old, is 1200 pages long and has countless provisions. Many of them have already taken effect, but much more change is to come over the next two years, most famously the so called individual mandate. In 2014, almost every US citizen will be required to buy health insurance, and companies of 50 or more employees will be required to offer it to their workers. In both cases, non-compliance results in a fine.

For three days in late March, the US Supreme Court listened to arguments on four issues that had been raised in lower court rulings on the law. In a circus atmosphere (demonstrators, presidential candidates, paid queue sitters) in the plaza outside the Greek temple that houses the court, and before an audience of luminaries inside, standing room only, the nine justices grilled (some would say filleted) the lawyers for both sides of the issues.

Four of the court’s justices, appointed by Republican presidents, are reliably conservative, and four, appointed by Democrats, are …

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL