Menu

 

Analysis

A consensus statement on research misconduct in the UK

BMJ 2012; 344 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e1111 (Published 16 February 2012)
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e1111

Related articles

Editorial: All trials must be registered and the results published

Published 9 January 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f105

Editorial: Helping institutions tackle research misconduct

Published 10 August 2012; BMJ 345 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5402

News: Strategy for boosting integrity of research is launched in UK

Published 12 July 2012; BMJ 345 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4747

News: Research bodies try to strengthen the integrity of UK research

Published 11 April 2012; BMJ 344 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2677

See more

News: Surgeon has 19 conditions placed on his practice

Published 20 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3283

Research Methods & Reporting: Diagnostic accuracy studies: how to report and analyse inconclusive test results

Published 16 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2778

Feature: A tale of two physicians: reflections on the Boston Marathon bombing

Published 10 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2993

Endgames: A man with bilateral loin pain

Published 9 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2850

This article has been cited by other articles:

Latest comments and most commented

THIS WEEK'S POLL

Read related article

See previous polls