GMC case against Wakefield’s colleague was “superficial,” says appealBMJ 2012; 344 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e1103 (Published 14 February 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e1103
- Clare Dyer
The General Medical Council panel that found Andrew Wakefield’s colleague John Walker-Smith guilty of serious professional misconduct and struck him off the medical register in 2010 was dealing with a task that was “beyond it,” his barrister told the High Court in London this week.
Stephen Miller QC told Mr Justice Mitting at the start of a two week appeal hearing that the panel ignored evidence that paediatric gastroenterologists at the Royal Free Hospital in London, headed by Professor Walker-Smith, were carrying out investigations that were clinically indicated and undertaken for the purposes of diagnosis and treatment and not for a research project.
Professor Walker-Smith, who retired in 2000, was one of …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial