OPEN ACCESS: All Research
Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications
Cite this as:
BMJ
2012;344:d8141
Related articles
Research Methods & Reporting: SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
Published 9 January 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586
Editorial: Missing clinical trial data
Published 3 January 2012; BMJ 344 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d8158
Published 13 October 2010; BMJ 341 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4737
Published 12 October 2010; BMJ 341 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4942
Published 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c723
Research Methods & Reporting: CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Published 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869
Research Methods & Reporting: CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Published 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332
Editor's Choice: We want raw data, now
Published 10 December 2009; BMJ 339 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5405
Published 7 November 2008; BMJ 337 doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1997
Education and debate: Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1)
Published 21 April 2005; BMJ 330 doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7497.956
This article has been cited by other articles:
PDF
Social bookmarking