Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications

BMJ 2012; 344 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d8141 (Published 3 January 2012)
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:d8141

Related articles

Research Methods & Reporting: SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

Editorial: Missing clinical trial data

Research: Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials

Analysis: Finding studies on reboxetine: a tale of hide and seek

Research: The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed

Research Methods & Reporting: CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Research Methods & Reporting: CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Editor's Choice: We want raw data, now

Analysis: German health care: a bit of Bismarck plus more science

Education and debate: Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1)

Data supplement

Web Extra

Web Extra

Web Extra

This article has been cited by other articles:

THIS WEEK'S POLL