Menu

 

Research Methods & Reporting

Out of sight but not out of mind: how to search for unpublished clinical trial evidence

BMJ 2012; 344 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d8013 (Published 3 January 2012)
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:d8013

Related articles

Research Methods & Reporting: SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

Published 9 January 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586

Editorial: Missing clinical trial data

Published 3 January 2012; BMJ 344 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d8158

Research Methods & Reporting: The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Published 18 October 2011; BMJ 343 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928

Analysis: Opening up data at the European Medicines Agency

Published 10 May 2011; BMJ 342 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2686

Editorial: Access to clinical trial data

Published 12 January 2011; BMJ 342 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d80

Analysis: Ensuring safe and effective drugs: who can do what it takes?

Published 11 January 2011; BMJ 342 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c7258

Research: Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists

Published 6 January 2011; BMJ 342 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c7153

Research: The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed

Published 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c723

Research: Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols

Published 4 December 2008; BMJ 337 doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2299

Paper: Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors

Published 31 March 2005; BMJ 330 doi: 10.1136/bmj.38356.424606.8F

PAPERS: Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors

Published 28 January 2005; BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.38356.424606.8F

Letter: SSRIs may well be best treatment for elderly depressed subjects

Published 14 February 1998; BMJ 316 doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7131.631

Letter: Authors' reply

Published 18 March 1995; BMJ 310 doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6981.741

Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials

Compliance with mandatory reporting of clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov

Understanding why evidence from randomised clinical trials may not be retrieved from Medline

Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data

Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials

Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov

Missing clinical trial data

See more

News: Dutch doctors get guidance on care of terminally ill newborn babies

Published 18 June 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3948

Letter: Bounty acts responsibly

Published 18 June 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3891

Letter: Accurate diagnosis and long term management is problem in epilepsy, not cost of drugs

Published 18 June 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3920

Letter: Catering for the needs of the new “community surgery,” which includes vasectomy

Published 18 June 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3924

News: First reviews are published that are based on the “totality of the evidence”

Published 17 June 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3909

This article has been cited by other articles:

Latest comments and most commented

THIS WEEK'S POLL

Read related article

See previous polls