Not all that’s new and shiny is good for healthcare

BMJ 2011; 343 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7997 (Published 8 December 2011)
Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d7997

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
  1. fgodlee{at}bmj.com

Concern has been growing about the use of metal on metal hip implants. In its 2011 report, the National Joint Registry for England and Wales identified problems including higher revision rates compared with more traditional ceramic or polyethylene implants (BMJ 2011;343:d5977). A BMJ investigation by Deborah Cohen asked why it took so long for one metal on metal implant, the ASR, to be withdrawn, highlighting denials and delays by the manufacturer and failings in the regulation of medical devices (BMJ 2011;342:d2905).

This week we publish a systematic review of research into the safety and effectiveness of hip implants. Art Sedrakyan and colleagues conclude that the evidence is inadequate, but what …

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL