Recent rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. Although a selection of rapid responses will be included as edited readers' letters in the weekly print issue of the BMJ, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window.
Displaying 1-1 out of 1 published
2 January 2012
Dr Lota's finding that registrars discharge patient less often from outpatient clinics fits in with common sense and the observations of most GP's. Assuming that the pattern he finds is a general one across the nhs - savings could be made by reducing the numbers of patients seen by registrars in outpatient clinics, assuming the patients are not seen instead by specialist nurses - who virtually never discharge patients!
However, surely it is the PCT's that bear the cost, not the trust. The £108 tariff represents income to the trust, and if the registrar is free then this becomes a surplus. Trust managers are not stupid, so this situation is likely to continue as long as the internal market continues.
It is also worth remembering that as well as costs to the taxpayer, the patient may have to take time off work, and that visits to distant outpatient clinics generates carbon emissions.
Competing interests: I am a taxpayer
bridge street surgery, brigg n lincs








Re: Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: a call for people to publish the findings
Published 19 June 2013
Re: Austerity policies in Europe—bad for health
Published 19 June 2013
Re: The gap in life expectancy from preventable physical illness in psychiatric patients in Western Australia: retrospective analysis of population based registers
Published 19 June 2013
Is there a role for agents affecting the GLP-1 system in treatment of type 2 diabetes today? No!
Published 19 June 2013