- Len Doyal, emeritus professor of medical ethics1,
- Thomas Muinzer, lawyer2
- 1Queen Mary, University of London, UK
- 2School of Law, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
- Correspondence to: L Doyal l.doyal{at}qmul.ac.uk
The skeleton of Charles Byrne, the famous “Irish giant,” has been displayed at the Hunterian Museum in the Royal College of Surgeons for almost 200 years. It played an important part in linking acromegaly with the pituitary gland. In 1909 the American surgeon Harvey Cushing removed the top of Byrne’s skull and observed an enlarged pituitary fossa, confirming a relation between the disease and adenoma. This finding has enabled the diagnosis and early treatment of people with acromegaly. At the beginning of this year, further important research led by Marta Korbonits used the DNA from two of Byrne’s molars to establish a genetic link between him and several people from a particular area of Northern Ireland.1 2 Aside from giving those susceptible to the disease the opportunity for appropriate medical care, this link perhaps helps to explain the long tradition of mythology about giants in Irish history.
Just as Byrne himself did when alive, so his skeleton continues to entertain the public.3 We believe that it should now be removed from display and buried at sea, as Byrne intended for himself. Others have expressed similar although not necessarily identical views.4 5 6 7 Byrne’s burial wish was not fulfilled because the pre-eminent surgeon and anatomist of the time, John Hunter, was determined to possess Byrne’s cadaver for his own purposes.8
Byrne and Hunter
The authors discuss the fate of the skeleton in a 15-minute video about acromegaly and Charles Byrne's life

Byrne was born in County Londonderry (part of a unified Ireland) in 1761. From a young age it was clear that he had a growth disorder. Historical accounts of his size vary, but his skeleton suggests he was about 7 feet 7 inches …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Hormone replacement therapy - psychiatric aspects
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Assaulting alternative medicine: worthwhile or witch hunt?
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Assaulting alternative medicine: worthwhile or witch hunt?
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Improving the delivery of safe and effective healthcare in low and middle income countries
Published 22 February 2012
Most responses
Assaulting alternative medicine: worthwhile or witch hunt? (12 responses)
Published 15 Feb 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Raised inflammatory markers (7 responses)
Published 3 Feb 2012
Independence in disciplinary proceedings against doctors (5 responses)
Published 24 Jan 2012