- Nigel Hawkes
- 1London
GlaxoSmithKline is to pay a record $3bn (£1.9bn; €2.2bn) to settle longstanding disputes with the US government over marketing of some of its best known drugs.
The disputes, some of which go back to 1997, include an investigation by the US Justice Department into the marketing of the antidiabetes drug rosiglitazone (marketed as Avandia) and GSK’s alleged attempts to market the antidepressant bupropion (Wellbutrin) as a slimming aid. The settlement also includes the alleged misuse of “nominal pricing” arrangements to overcharge the Medicaid programme.
Comparison with other large fines levied by the US authorities is difficult, because so many different drugs are involved in the GSK case, but the amount it is prepared to pay exceeds the previous highest levied at one …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Why the US healthcare system is failing, and what might rescue it
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Risk of cardiovascular serious adverse events associated with varenicline use for tobacco cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 16 May 2012
Most responses
Is spending on proton beam therapy for cancer going too far, too fast? (11 responses)
Published 17 Apr 2012 - 23:32
What are the benefits of an early diagnosis? (8 responses)
Published 18 Apr 2012
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21