Personal View

Global health cannot be achieved without efforts to curb population growth

BMJ 2011; 343 doi: (Published 31 October 2011)
Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d7003

Recent rapid responses

Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on Although a selection of rapid responses will be included as edited readers' letters in the weekly print issue of the BMJ, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window.

Displaying 1-1 out of 1 published

22 November 2011

Dear Editor,

The entire World population of 7 billion could live comfortably in the State of Texas, USA, or other Countries. [2][3][4][5][6][8]

This population hysteria [1] is not evidence-based and extremely counterproductive.

Sustainability and health status have very little to do with the number of residents.

Do we honestly think that Britons would be healthier if they only counted 20 million?

The world is already growing enough grain to feed a population of 10 billion on a vegetarian diet. [9][7]

Many Organizations and Charities are lobbying their funding expansion through population hysteria. Readers should only take into consideration undisputed scientific facts.










[9] Fred Pearce, Peoplequake, 2010

Competing interests: None declared

Stavros Saripanidis, Consultant in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Private Surgery, Thessaloniki, Greece

Click to like: