Management of deep vein thrombosis and prevention of post-thrombotic syndromeBMJ 2011; 343 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5916 (Published 31 October 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d5916
- R H W Strijkers, PhD student, venous surgery1,
- A J ten Cate-Hoek, thrombosis specialist and clinical epidemiologist2,
- S F F W Bukkems, resident in physiatry3,
- C H A Wittens, vascular surgeon, professor in venous surgery14
- 1Department of Vascular Surgery and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, 6202 AZ, Netherlands
- 2Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Laboratory of Haematology, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
- 3Department of Physiatry, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, the Netherlands
- 4Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Correspondence to: C H A Wittens
Suspect deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients who present with sudden swelling, redness, and pain of the calf or leg
Standard treatment is anticoagulation for at least three months, daily wearing of compressive stockings for two years, and immediate mobilisation
Anticoagulation protects against pulmonary embolism but post-thrombotic syndrome is common after DVT
Post-thrombotic syndrome is a chronic debilitating condition seen in about 43% of patients with DVT within two years
Patients present with a painful heavy leg and may also have cramps, paraesthesia, and pruritus
Catheter directed thrombolysis for DVT is a new treatment under study that may improve quality of life and reduce the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome
The annual global incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the leg is 1.6 per 1000.1 Classically, venous thrombosis of a lower limb begins in a deep calf vein and propagates more proximally. Symptoms include swelling, pain, and redness of the leg, depending on the vein segment(s) involved (see table 1⇓).2 Patients are at risk of pulmonary embolism.3 Despite optimal conservative treatment with anticoagulation and compression, one in four patients develops a post-thrombotic syndrome within one year,2 and one in three develops a recurrent DVT within five years.4 Patients with post-thrombotic syndrome have poor quality of life.5 A more aggressive approach to treatment, such as removal of early thrombus using catheter directed thrombolysis, might improve outcomes for patients with DVT compared with standard anticoagulation treatment.4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 We review standard and new, more aggressive, management of DVT for the generalist reader, drawing from recent guidelines, cohort studies, small randomised controlled trails, and meta-analyses. All authors are investigators in the CAVA trial, which is one of three randomised controlled trials currently investigating outcomes after treatment with catheter directed thrombolysis (trial registration number NCT00970619).
Sources and selection criteria
We conducted a review to answer the question: does catheter directed thrombolysis have a role in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis? We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Medline up to April 2011 and found several randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses, as well as guidelines. We made a selection on the basis of scientific strength and clinical relevance.
Who gets DVT?
The formation of venous thrombosis depends on a triad of hypercoagulability, stasis, and interruption of the integrity of the vein wall. One or more factors may dominate, depending on the underlying risk factor. Table 2⇓ outlines the known risk factors for DVT.6 The most common locations for venous thromboses of the leg are shown in table 1.2
How is DVT diagnosed?
Patients with DVT usually present with pain and swelling of the leg, varying degrees of redness, or muscle cramps. When DVT is confined to the popliteal vein the calf will be mostly affected. When DVT originates or extends more proximally to the iliofemoral vein segment, patients usually have swelling of the whole leg and more severe pain and redness. Mobility may be impaired because of heaviness and pain in the leg. In severe cases patients may develop phlegmasia cerulea dolens (fig 1⇓).
Because these clinical signs are not specific to DVT clinical scoring systems and diagnostic tests have been developed.
The Wells score is the most widely validated method used to assess a patient’s risk of current DVT (box). A Wells score of less than 2 means that the patient has a low risk of DVT, while those with a score of 2 or more are at high risk of current DVT.7 A D-dimer test demonstrates the presence of blood clot degradation products. It has a sensitivity of 95.3% and a specificity of 44.7% for DVT. The negative predictive value is high at 97.7%, making it a useful test for ruling out DVT.8 A negative D-dimer blood test and a Wells score of less then 2 are effective in ruling out a DVT without the need for duplex ultrasound.9
Wells score for risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
Factors with a score of 1 point
Active cancer treatment (treatment less than six months ago or palliation)
Paralysis, paresis, or recent plaster immobilisation of the lower extremities
Recently bedridden for more than three days or major surgery within past four weeks
Localised tenderness along the distribution of the deep venous system
Entire leg swollen
Calf swollen by more than 3 cm when compared with the asymptomatic leg
Collateral superficial veins (non-varicose)
Previously documented DVT
Factor with a score of −2 points
An alternative diagnosis is as likely or more likely than a diagnosis of DVT
<2: low risk of DVT
≥2: high risk of DVT
In patients with clinical signs consistent with DVT and a Wells score of 2 or more or a positive D-dimer test (or both), imaging is used to confirm the diagnosis. Non-invasive two point duplex ultrasound is the current standard imaging technique. Duplex ultrasound has a sensitivity of 98.7% and specificity of 100% to detect or rule out an above knee thrombus, and a sensitivity of 85.2% and specificity of 98.2% for below knee DVT, when compared with the gold standard (invasive venography).10 Computed tomography venography and magnetic resonance venography can be used to image the exact extent of the DVT (fig 2⇓).11 12
Why is it important to treat DVT?
Risk of pulmonary embolism
If DVT is left untreated about 50% of patients will develop a symptomatic pulmonary embolism, which carries a 10% risk of death within one hour of onset of initial symptoms. The main goal of treatment is to prevent pulmonary embolism, propagation of the clot, and recurrence of the DVT.13 14 15
Risk of post-thrombotic syndrome
In addition, 43-47% of patients develop post-thrombotic syndrome within two years of developing symptomatic DVT, although some studies have reported higher rates (>60%) in patients with iliofemoral DVT.2 16 Post-thrombotic syndrome is a chronic debilitating condition caused by venous hypertension as a result of persistent obstruction of venous outflow and venous insufficiency. A recent observational study found a severely decreased quality of life in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome comparable to that of patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes, obstructive lung disease, and congestive heart failure.5 Patients present with a painful heavy leg and may also have cramps, paraesthesia, and pruritus. On examination the leg may be oedematous with varicosities or hyperpigmentation of the skin (or both). The condition can be classified according to the recently developed and validated Villalta scale (see web figure).17 A retrospective study estimated that 30%, 10%, and 3% of people with DVT develop mild, moderate, and severe post-thrombotic syndrome, respectively, and venous obstruction combined with reflux increased the risk significantly.18 A more severe post-thrombotic syndrome at one month, more extensive DVT (iliofemoral versus calf DVT), higher body mass index, previous ipsilateral DVT, older age, and female sex seem to predict the long term severity of post-thrombotic syndrome.2
Risk of venous ulcer disease
Of those who develop post-thrombotic syndrome, 3-5% go on to develop venous ulcers,19 which are usually painful, resistant to treatment, and tend to recur. Venous ulcers may greatly impair the patient’s quality of life and incur high healthcare costs.2 Figure 3⇓ illustrates venous ulcer disease in a patient with post-thrombotic syndrome.
What is the current standard treatment for DVT?
Standard treatment for DVT is immediate anticoagulation with subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin and later with oral anticoagulants. Compression treatment with elastic stockings and early ambulation also form part of conservative treatment.20 Guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), which are based on level 1A evidence from high quality randomised controlled trials,13 recommend immediate anticoagulation with subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins for at least five days, and that the patient should simultaneously take oral anticoagulants such as warfarin for at least three months. The duration of oral treatment depends on the cause of the DVT and whether it can be eliminated or not. Anticoagulation alone decreases the risk of pulmonary embolism to 3.8%, the risk of recurrent DVT to 30%, and the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome to 82%.
ACCP guidelines also recommend that compression treatment be started immediately, using compressive bandaging or elastic stockings with a compression pressure of 30-40 mm Hg, and continued for at least two years; this is based on evidence from high quality randomised trials. Compression does not reduce the risk of pulmonary embolism or recurrence of DVT, but it has been shown to decrease the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome by about 50% at two years. Immediate mobilisation is also recommended. Conservative treatment can be safely carried out at home.13 21 22 23
Although the standard treatment regimen reduces the risk of pulmonary embolism, recurrent DVT, and post-thrombotic syndrome, patients remain at increased risk of pulmonary embolism, recurrence of DVT (30% within five years), and post-thrombotic syndrome (43% at two years). Patients treated with anticoagulants are also at increased risk of severe bleeding complications.24 25 26 This has led to research into new treatments for DVT.
Are there any new treatments under study for iliofemoral DVT?
Catheter directed thrombolysis
A recent observational study found that the degree of clot lysis at treatment is directly correlated with long term outcome after iliofemoral DVT.27 Patients with iliofemoral DVT have double the risk of recurrent thrombosis compared with those with DVT below this segment.28 On the basis of these findings experts consider that patients with iliofemoral DVT might benefit most from a more aggressive approach to thrombus removal.
A systematic review has shown that the administration of systemic thrombolytic agents—aimed at achieving indirect clot lysis—achieves a small increase in vein segment patency, but the risk of clinically relevant bleeding complications is high, so systemic thrombolysis is no longer used for DVT.29 However, findings from a non-randomised prospective study of catheter directed thrombolysis, which involves infusion of thrombolytic agents through a catheter directly into the thrombus, suggested that the technique can safely lyse thrombus without appreciable systemic effects and may also restore normal valve function and prevented post-thrombotic reflux (a further risk factor for post-thrombotic syndrome).30
The findings of several non-randomised studies and two small randomised controlled trials that compared catheter directed thrombolysis with standard anticoagulation treatment show that catheter directed thrombolysis may reduce the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome compared with standard anticoagulation alone.w1-w9 A systematic review of published studies reported that catheter directed thrombolysis, as an adjunct to standard DVT treatment, reduced the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome from 78% to 27%, although the rate of minor bleeding complications was 8% in patients with thrombolytic treatment.29 w1 Small retrospective studies of catheter directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral DVT have suggested that successful catheter directed thrombolysis may have a positive effect on the validated health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) questionnaire, but further study is needed.w2 w4
Currently, three large randomised controlled trials are under way to investigate the effectiveness and safety of catheter directed thrombolysis (the Norwegian CaVent trial,w10 the North American ATTRACT trial,w11 and the Dutch CAVA trial). Results of these trials, for which the primary outcome is risk of post-thrombotic syndrome, are much anticipated. If they robustly show that thrombus removal using chemical and mechanical techniques significantly decreases post-thrombotic syndrome and improves clinical outcomes, the treatment of iliofemoral DVT may be revolutionised.
Combined mechanical and chemical thrombolysis
Several catheter directed thrombolysis devices now combine mechanical energy with chemical thrombolysis (fig 4⇓), and one of these systems has been shown to be effective in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusions,w5 massive pulmonary embolism,w12 and acute ischaemic stroke.w13 w14 Two small patient series have evaluated this ultrasound accelerated catheter directed thrombolysis for the treatment of patients with DVT and shown comparable results.w5 w6
All combined systems require evaluation in randomised studies with large sample sizes because currently there is only low quality evidence to support their use.w15 The Dutch CAVA trial is evaluating the EKOS Endowave system.w16
CAVA: a randomised controlled trial comparing ultrasound accelerated catheter directed thrombolysis with standard anticoagulation alone in iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT); the study is evaluating the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome after one year
ATTRACT: a randomised controlled trial comparing all catheter directed thrombolysis methods with anticoagulation alone in patients with iliofemoral DVT over a period of two years
CaVenT: randomised controlled trial comparing catheter directed thrombolysis with standard anticoagulation treatment with regard to the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome after a period of two years.
Additional educational resources
Resources for healthcare professionals
American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestnet.org/accp/guidelines)—This guideline provides the evidence for the current treatment standards
Resources for patients
Patient UK (www.patient.co.uk/health/Deep-Vein-Thrombosis.htm)—Information and advice for patients on deep vein thrombosis
Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d5916
Contributors: RHWS helped with the writing, methods, literature search, and data gathering; AJtC-H helped with the methods and writing; SFFWB helped with the writing, data gathering, and literature search; CHAW helped with the literature search, writing, and provision of pictures. CHAW is guarantor.
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; all authors are involved in the randomised controlled CAVA-trial (clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00970619).
Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.