Current guidance for medical journals allows industry input to remain hidden, critic says

BMJ 2011; 343 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5132 (Published 9 August 2011)
Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d5132

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Stephen Ginn
  1. 1BMJ

International guidelines for medical journals are too lax and enable drug companies to conceal their contributions to scientific papers, says a personal view published in PLoS Medicine (doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001072).

Alastair Matheson, who has worked as a consultant and freelance writer for the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries for more than 15 years, says that the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors need to be “fundamentally revised,” because they fail to differentiate clearly between authors and contributors.

The guidelines identify authors as those who have contributed to the preparation of a study at three stages, the third of which is the final sign-off. As long as researchers make some …

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL