The abstract of this research paper by Rémy Boussageon and colleagues (BMJ 2011;343:d4169, doi:10.1136/bmj.d4169) stated that intensive therapy was associated with a more than twofold increase in the risk of severe hypoglycaemia, but the confidence interval given for the risk ratio supporting this finding was wrong. The risk ratio and confidence interval should have read “2.33 (1.62 to 3.36)” [not 2.33 (21.62 to 3.36) as was published]. These data were correctly cited elsewhere in the article.
Notes
Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d5030







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27