Intended for healthcare professionals

Editorials

Putting genomics into practice

BMJ 2011; 343 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4953 (Published 04 August 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d4953
  1. Michael V Holmes, Medical Research Council population health scientist fellow1,
  2. Juan P Casas, senior lecturer in epidemiology2,
  3. Aroon D Hingorani, professor of genetic epidemiology1
  1. 1Genetic Epidemiology Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
  2. 2Faculty of Epidemiology and Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  1. a.hingorani{at}ucl.ac.uk

A new analysis casts doubt on the clinical utility of CYP2C19 genotype testing to help guide antiplatelet prescribing

Variation in the human genome has long been considered to contribute to individual differences in disease susceptibility and drug response. But a key question for clinical practice is whether knowledge of a patient’s genotype could be useful for stratifying disease risk or guiding treatment. In the linked systematic review (doi:10.1136/bmj.d4588) Bauer and colleagues report a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the association of variation in the CYP2C19 gene and atherothrombotic events during treatment with clopidogrel.1

The sequence of the human genome is now known,2 as are the positions of the several million nucleotides that differ most commonly from one person to the next and their inheritance patterns in different human populations. Laboratory and analytical techniques now permit rapid cost effective direct (and indirect) genotyping of many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genomes of many thousands of people to gain insight into the regions that influence disease related biomarkers, susceptibility to common diseases, or the response to widely prescribed drugs.

By 2011, nearly 1000 such genome-wide association studies had reported their findings (figure).3 Genome-wide association studies of disease risk are typically large and collaborative, and the results have usually been replicated in independent samples before publication. …

View Full Text

Log in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe

* For online subscription