- Joris A H de Groot, clinical epidemiologist1,
- Patrick M M Bossuyt, professor of clinical epidemiology2,
- Johannes B Reitsma, associate professor of clinical epidemiology2,
- Anne W S Rutjes, senior researcher3,
- Nandini Dendukuri, assistant professor clinical epidemiology and biostatistics4,
- Kristel J M Janssen, clinical epidemiologist1,
- Karel G M Moons, professor of clinical epidemiology1
- 1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary care, UMC Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508GA Utrecht, Netherlands
- 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, 1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 3Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine-University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- 4Royal Victoria Hospital, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1
- Correspondence to: J A H de Groot j.degroot-17{at}umcutrecht.nl
The accuracy of a diagnostic test or combination of tests (such as in a diagnostic model) is the ability to correctly identify patients with or without the target disease. In studies of diagnostic accuracy, the results of the test or model under study are verified by comparing them with results of a reference standard, applied to the same patients, to verify disease status (see first panel in figure⇓).1 Measures such as predictive values, post-test probabilities, ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curves, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and odds ratios express how well the results of an index test agree with the outcome of the reference standard.2 Biased and exaggerated estimates of diagnostic accuracy can lead to inefficiencies in diagnostic testing in practice, unnecessary costs, and physicians making incorrect treatment decisions.
Diagnostic accuracy studies with (a) complete verification by the same reference standard, (b) partial verification, or (c)differential verification
The reference standard ideally provides error-free classification of the disease outcome presence or absence. In some cases, it is not possible to verify the definitive presence or absence of disease in all patients with the (single) reference standard, which may result in bias. In this paper, we describe the most important types of disease verification problems using examples from published diagnostic accuracy studies. We also propose solutions to alleviate the associated biases.
Partial verification
Often not all study subjects who undergo the index test receive the reference standard, leading to missing data on disease outcome (see middle panel in figure⇑). The bias associated with such situations of partial verification is known as partial verification bias, work-up bias, or referral bias.3 4 5
Clinical examples of partial verification
Various mechanisms can lead to partial verification (see examples in table 1⇓).
View this table:- In this window
- In a new window
Table 1 Examples of diagnostic accuracy studies with problems in disease verification
When the condition of interest …
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27