Letters MMR scare

The BMJ’s measly editorial policies

BMJ 2011; 342 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d809 (Published 08 February 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:d809
  1. Neil MacFarlane, independent consultant in adult developmental psychiatry1
  1. 1London W1G 8GB, UK
  1. neilmacf{at}btinternet.com

The BMJ is right to pursue the autism/MMR/Wakefield issue,1 and to highlight the need for wider vaccination against measles. But problems remain. How is “good” investigative journalism to be reliably distinguished from the “bad” of certain newspapers and magazines? By detail alone? I am not convinced that if the Mail’s Melanie Phillips, say, had spent the same amount of time on the story, she would necessarily have ended …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial