The north-south health divide

BMJ 2011; 342 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d584 (Published 15 February 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:d584
  1. Margaret Whitehead, WH Duncan professor of public health1,
  2. Tim Doran, clinical research fellow2
  1. 1Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK
  2. 2School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  1. mmw{at}liverpool.ac.uk

The NHS must do more than pick up the pieces

The north-south divide is one of England’s most powerful and enduring myths: one country geographically, politically, and culturally separated into beautiful south and grim north. On one side rolling fields, dazzling sunshine, conspicuous wealth, conservatism, and flat beer; on the other coal, cloud, desolation, socialism, and froth.

In the linked observational study (doi:10.1136/bmj.d508), Hacking and colleagues show that not only is the divide in premature mortality real, but that it has persisted and continued to widen over four decades and under five governments.1 Since 1965, the toll of excess deaths has surpassed 1.5 million—the north is being decimated at the rate of a major city every decade.

Many explanations have been offered for this northern catastrophe. Hacking and colleagues discuss the contributions of genetics, lifestyle, and migration and find them modest. Explanations related to the differing social composition of the population in the north compared with the south also fall short, because southerners enjoy better health across the entire social spectrum.2 Any damage inflicted by climate and geology is likely to be indirect: the cotton industry developed where the weather was …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial