Observations Reality Check

It’s time to rebuild the evidence base

BMJ 2011; 342 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3004 (Published 25 May 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:d3004
  1. Ray Moynihan, author, journalist, and conjoint lecturer, University of Newcastle, Australia
  1. Ray.Moynihan{at}newcastle.edu.au

With medical science so contaminated by conflicts of interest, what evidence can we trust?

For many of us, the move towards an evidence based approach to medicine has largely been a welcome one. We have learnt to evaluate therapies rigorously and be highly sceptical of expert enthusiasm for them. Perhaps most importantly, we now try to turn routinely to summaries of the evidence rather than rely on single studies. For what we assumed were good reasons, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become gold standards, whether we are a politician, a physician, or simply a citizen. But is it fool’s gold? In our collective zeal to summarise, we have too often ignored the fact that a vast and growing proportion of those original studies are industry sponsored, which means that they tend to exaggerate benefits and play down harms. Summarising that bias doesn’t make it go away. Medicine’s prized evidence base has become debased.

An international team of researchers from across Europe and North America recently examined 29 meta-analyses published in leading medical journals.1 Those meta-analyses summarised results of more than 500 trials of top selling drugs for conditions …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial

Subscribe