Experts deny claims that peer review system is in crisis

doi:10.1136/bmj.d2858

From trainee to consultant, BMJ Group offers doctors around the world tailored information, special events, learning resources and recruitment services at every step along their career path.

... by doctors, for doctors, for patients
We are open for entries!

Online learning

BMJ Learning

High-quality CME / CPD for doctors and other healthcare professionals. BMJ Learning features hundreds of accredited, peer-reviewed learning modules in text, video, and audio formats. Find out more

Courses and Qualifications

BMJ Masterclasses

BMJ Masterclasses, led by experts, help clinicians to use the latest evidence and recent guidelines in practice and meet their CPD/CME requirements. Find out more

Exam Preparation

The leading provider of online exam preparation, helping over 167,000 healthcare professionals to pass their exams. Find out more

onExamination

Search all BMJ news articles:

From

The BMJ iPad app brings you the best of print and online, including live links to the latest news, blogs, video, and podcasts. Get the BMJ iPad app.
Countdown to London 2012: BMJ Group's Olympics portal highlights latest Olympics and sports medicine-themed research, comment and learning
Keep up to date with cardiology: Access the latest cardiovascular medicine resources from across BMJ Group.
Our online table of contents is updated at least twice each day. Read all articles published in the last 7 days.
OPEN ACCESS: All research articles are freely available online, with no word limit. Find out more about the BMJ's open access policy. Submit your paper.

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Adrian O’Dowd

¹London

Experts have defended the peer review system used by many medical journals before publishing new research and denied claims that it is in “crisis.”

Witnesses appearing before the parliamentary science and technology select committee on 4 May said the system was not perfect but worked well and helped to maintain the public’s trust in science.

MPs on the committee were holding their first oral evidence session as part of their new inquiry into the current state of the peer review process in science. They were prompted to look into peer review by several factors, said a spokeswoman, including the leaked emails on climate change from the University of East Anglia and the Lancet study by Andrew Wakefield.

MPs …