- Rupert Dunbar-Rees, general practitioner and healthcare management adviser 1,
- Robert McGough, solicitor 2
- 1Healthcare Advisory Practice, BDO, London W1U 7EU, UK
- 2Beachcroft, Leeds LS1 2LW, UK
- Correspondence to: Rupert Dunbar-Rees Rupert.Dunbar-Rees{at}bdo.co.uk
- Accepted 11 March 2011
The health white paper1 has generated considerable debate, but there has been little discussion about the practical implementation of the processes underpinning its requirements. Many commentators have drawn parallels between some features of general practice commissioning and previous commissioning incarnations, such as fundholding and total purchasing pilots. However, the regulatory landscape has changed beyond all measure since then,2 3 4 and this fundamentally affects the way consortiums purchase support services and healthcare.
The National Health Service has moved from a position 20 years ago where most healthcare spending was essentially the state purchasing care from itself, to the current proposals to extend the “any willing provider” (or any qualified provider) model and further distance NHS hospitals from the state.5 All providers of care, including the independent sector, are set to be able to compete for NHS funded services on an equal footing.1 Since the state is increasingly less a direct provider of care, it could be argued that EU competition law should apply to the allocation of public spending with providers. Surprisingly, the Department of Health’s impact assessment on the reforms does not consider the effect of EU competition law, even in the sections covering economic regulation.6 We examine the effect of EU and UK regulations concerning the spending of public money on general practice commissioning and the wider NHS.2 3 4
General practice consortiums as contracting authorities
The first issue to establish is whether general practice consortiums will be bound by procurement regulations concerning the spending of public money and EU competition law in general. This depends on whether they will be deemed “contracting authorities governed by public law,” and therefore bound by the regulations.7 Our view is that consortiums will be bound …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27