- Matthew Limb
- 1London
Experts from the NHS and local government have voiced fresh concerns over legislation that will pave the way for a major shake up of public health in England.
They warned a House of Commons inquiry that the Health and Social Care Bill is vague about who will be responsible under the new system for funding and coordinating key services.
Frank Atherton, president of the Association of Directors of Public Health, called for greater clarity from government saying that uncertainty carried risks.
He said there was potential for fragmentation affecting services such as health protection and emergency planning, cancer, health in schools, and domestic violence.
He told the inquiry. “It’s hard to see how the pandemic response would be planned under the [new] system. One problem is that GP consortia won’t have the same responsibilities as primary …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27